Britain and European Commission clash over EU ‘workers’

0
993
Work and Pensions Minister Ian Duncan Smith
Work and Pensions Minister Ian Duncan Smith

A new government proposal to limit access to social welfare payments by EU citizens has been branded illegal by the European Commission. This pronouncement escalates a war of words between the EU and the UK over the free movement of European workers.
Work and Pensions Minister, Ian Duncan Smith, has decreed that, from March 1st onwards, EU migrants to the UK must normally be able to show that they have earned at least £150 per week for at least three months before they can claim UK benefits such as Jobseekers Allowance.
Mr Duncan Smith said that EU citizens who had been in work but had not earned £150 per week for the required period would be tested to see whether they had been in ‘genuine and effective’ employment or they would be denied benefits. The EU’s definition of a worker includes a requirement that the work engaged in must be genuine and effective.
Minimum earnings threshold
But on 19th February 2014, a spokesman for the European Commission told journalists that using ‘a minimum earnings threshold’ to decide who would be eligible for benefits would be contrary to European law.
The spokesman said that the EU’s definition of a worker was ‘any person who carries out genuine and effective work for which he or she is paid under the direction of someone else’. He continued ‘The Court of Justice’s case law makes it clear that…a definition of a worker according to the amount he or she earns is not compatible with EU law.
The UK government insists that its definition of work is in accord with EU law. It says that the fact that those earning less than £150 per week will be able to prove that they qualify as ‘workers’ by showing that they engage in ‘genuine and effective’ work means that they are abiding by the EU’s definition of ‘a worker’.
EC will scrutinise measures ‘very closely’
The European Commission says that it has asked the Government to send the full details of its proposals to the Commission. The spokesman said: “The European Commission will scrutinise very closely the latest measures announced by the UK to ensure their full compliance with EU law”.
This is merely the latest episode in a running battle between the UK and the EU over immigration. The Coalition government has introduced numerous changes to prevent the scourge of ‘benefits tourism’; that is, EU citizens coming to the UK to claim benefits rather than to work.
The European Commission insists that the threat of ‘benefits tourism’ is ‘a myth’. On 10th February, the European Commissioner for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion, Laszlo Andor, gave a speech in Bristol in which he laid out data which show that EU migrants to the UK are actually far less likely to claim benefits than UK citizens and were more likely to be better educated and to be in work.
EC attacking UK for demonising EU migrants
Mr Andor, along with other senior European Commission figures, has attacked the Government for demonising EU migrants and for ignoring the facts when formulating policy. If their intention was to make the Government change course, it seems to have had no effect.
In fact, it may be that Mr Cameron’s government is actually seeking out arguments with the European Commission for electoral purposes.
The UK has struggled with membership of the European Union since it joined in 1975. Most of the press is virulently anti-EU and there is a sizeable proportion of the electorate that would like to leave the Union or, at the very least, hold a referendum on the UK’s EU membership.
Cameron’s Conservatives under attack
In recent years, the UK Independence Party (UKIP) has scored significant electoral gains. Polls show that UKIP currently scores a fairly steady 12% support in opinion polls.
UKIP is thought to gain most of its support at the expense David Cameron’s Conservatives Party. Mr Cameron is said to fear that UKIP can cost him the next general election in 2015 by splitting the right-wing vote and allowing the left-wing Labour Party to win more seats.
On top of this, Mr Cameron’s own party has become much more negative about Europe since 2010 when most of the newly elected Conservative MPs were ardently ‘Eurosceptic’. Therefore, it may well be in Mr Cameron’s interests to create an argument with ‘Europe’ to boost his Eurosceptic credentials ahead of the European elections in May 2014.